Editorial
Editorial to Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 1/2016.
Archiv für Mai 2016
L’impérialisme institutionnel et la question de la race chez Aristote
10.1080/13507486.2016.1154927<br/>Philippe-André Rodriguez
Discourses of Regulation and Resistance: Censoring Translation in the Stalin and Khrushchev Era Soviet Union
10.1080/14781700.2016.1178597<br/>Nune Ayvazyan
After Translation: The Transfer and Circulation of Modern Poetics Across the Atlantic; The Worlds of Langston Hughes: Modernism and Translation in the Americas; Modernism and the New Spain: Britain, Cosmopolitan Europe, and Literary History
10.1080/14781700.2016.1178596<br/>Eric Keenaghan
Early central regulation, slow financial participation: relations between primary education and the Dutch state from ± 1750–1920
10.1080/00309230.2016.1170708<br/>Dick van Gijlswijk
The Liverpool Dock Strike, 1995–98: a resurgence of solidarity in the age of globalisation
10.1080/0023656X.2016.1184046<br/>Brian Marren
“Forward to David the Builder!” Georgia’s (re)turn to language-centered nationalism
10.1080/00905992.2016.1142519<br/>Christofer Berglund
Repression and endurance: anathematized Hindu and Sikh women of Afghanistan
10.1080/00905992.2016.1153613<br/>Hafizullah Emadi
‘From an Impure Source, All Is Impure’: The Rise and Fall of Andrija Štampar’s Public Health Eugenics in Yugoslavia
<span class=“paragraphSection“><div class=“boxTitle“>Summary</div>Andrija Štampar (1888–1958) was one of the leading public health activists in the first half of the twentieth century. In the countries of former Yugoslavia he is remembered as the pivotal public health figure, a man who led the project of building 250 health institutions during his tenure in the Ministry of Public Health (1919–1931). Internationally, historians acknowledge his role as the president of the Interim Commission (1946–1948) in the development of the World Health Organization. This paper will explore a lesser-known side of Štampar, reinterpreting him as a eugenicist concerned with the biological quality of the Yugoslav population in the aftermath of the First World War. I will present his development as a eugenicist through three phases, and provide socioeconomic, scientific and personal contexts that shaped his evolving relationship with eugenics.</span>
Why Is the Resistance towards Both Female Researchers and a Gender Perspective within Research Still so Strong?
10.1080/08038740.2016.1178667<br/>Lotta Karin Snickare