Judith Rainhorn, ed., Sante et travail a la mine, XIXe-XXIe siecle,
Quelle: http://shm.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/29/3/645?rss=1
Quelle: http://shm.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/29/3/645?rss=1
This feed no longer exists. Cambridge Journals Online and Cambridge Books Online have been replaced by Cambridge University Press’s new academic platform, Cambridge Core: the new home of Cambridge ebooks and journals.
Cambridge Core does not support RSS feeds. Therefore, please visit Cambridge Core at http://cambridge.org/core to find the latest content from Cambridge University Press. You can also sign up for table of content alerts for your favourite journals.
Volume 52, Issue 5, October 2016, pages 423-437<br/>10.1080/00309230.2016.1211156<br/>Marta Padovan-Özdemir
10.1080/13507486.2016.1191440<br/>Sílvia Correia
<span class=“paragraphSection“><div class=“boxTitle“>Abstract</div>In 1542, Henry VIII authorised the first of a series of debasements of the English silver coinage which would collectively come to be known as the ‘great debasement’ of the mid-sixteenth century. The debasement was accompanied by a period of inflation and political change, and for contemporary observers these phenomena were inextricably linked. The coinage became the subject of a growing critical discourse, and governors feared that popular discontent threatened to spill over into riot and disorder—and perhaps even the subversion of the commonwealth. Moving away from the details of mint policy and quantitative assessments of the circulating medium that have previously occupied historians, this article explores the coinage as a topic of political discourse in the mid-Tudor period. As a matter of state, the coinage was a topic on which ordinary subjects were supposed to be silent and even Crown agents had to be circumspect, as criticising the coinage could be classed as sedition and mishandling it was a treasonous offence. But because of its status as common currency, the coinage was always in the public sphere, and was subject to the vagaries of popular opinion. This article recovers a range of contemporary perceptions and discussions of the coinage, from royal proclamations, government documents, and formal treatises, to correspondence, diary entries, court cases, and rumours. In so doing, it shows that the Crown’s efforts to control the coinage were consonant with its attempts to control political discourse and the discussion of matters of state in the mid-sixteenth century.</span>
<span class=“paragraphSection“>TurdaMarius and GilletteAaron, <strong><span style=“font-style:italic;“>Latin Eugenics in Comparative Perspective</span></strong>, London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. Pp. x + 306. IS…
<span class=“paragraphSection“><span style=“font-style:italic;“>Religious Diaspora in Early Modern Europe: Strategies of Exile</span>, ed. FehlerTimothy G., KroekerGreta Grace, ParkerCharles and RayJonathan (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2014; pp. 247. £60).</span>
<span class=“paragraphSection“><span style=“font-style:italic;“>Itinerario per la Terraferma Veneziana</span>, by SanudoMarino, ed. VaraniniGian Maria (Rome: Viella, 2014; pp. 684. €50).</span>
10.1080/09557571.2016.1166479<br/>Sascha Lohmann
10.1080/09557571.2016.1170762<br/>Mervyn Bain
Powered by
WordPress and plainscape theme.