April 14, 2015, 11:01 p.m.,
The University of Chicago Press: The Journal of Modern History,
book review,
Book Reviews.
Review by: William J. Connell
The Journal of Modern History, Volume 87, Issue 1, Page 204-205, March 2015.
Quelle: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/10.1086/680116?ai=uz&mi=w0q6y1&af=R
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 11:01 p.m.,
The University of Chicago Press: The Journal of Modern History,
book review,
Book Reviews.
Review by: Mark Jurdjevic
The Journal of Modern History, Volume 87, Issue 1, Page 202-204, March 2015.
Quelle: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/10.1086/680115?ai=uz&mi=w0q6y1&af=R
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 4:27 p.m.,
BRONWEN NEIL,
Allgemein.
Early Christian and early Islamic texts on dreams and dream interpretation have come under increased scrutiny in recent decades. Dream literature from pagan and Jewish antiquity to the early medieval period demonstrates that dreams, especially prophetic dreams, were used to establish spiritual authority, enforce compliance, and justify violence in a religious context. The common cultural roots of Christianity and Islam emerge when we recognise the crucial role played by dreams and prophecy in the two traditions. The various methodologies used in recent scholarship on dreams and their interpretation are surveyed with a view to identifying those most relevant to the analysis of first-millennium CE literary sources in Latin, Greek, Syriac, and Arabic. The key texts from the three major religious traditions in this period (Western Christian, Eastern Christian, and Islamic) are then analysed with a view to assessing whether early Christians and Muslims understood and taxonomised dreams differently. Literary genre and audience (lay, clerical, or monastic) are revealed as the key determinants of difference, rather than religious origins.
Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2F1467-9809.12262
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 2:30 p.m.,
Josep Maria Antentas,
Allgemein.
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 2:30 p.m.,
John Glenn,
Allgemein.
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 2:27 p.m.,
Philomena Murray,
Allgemein.
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 11:05 a.m.,
Laura Monica Ramsay,
Allgemein.
This article extends and develops recent historical discussion on the relationship between British Christianity, sexuality, and modernity, proposing some ways forward for future scholarship. Recent accounts have concentrated on liberal Anglican positions on issues of sexuality, but here the focus is on the British Council of Churches, its early moral welfare work, and interdenominational efforts to reconsider Christian sex teaching in the immediate post-war years. While examining broader trends towards positive statements about sex and attempts to assemble self-regulating sexual citizens in Christian moral welfare thinking, the article suggests that, far from a narrative of relatively untroubled and gradual acceptance of progressive Christian views on sex, this was a halting and uncertain process. The article reflects closely on the complexities of post-war Christian attempts to work with new ideas about sexuality and to formulate their own version of them, the difficulties and ambiguities involved in developing a cogent position in a debate where Christian opinion was so fiercely divided, as well as the complicated nature of institutional decision-making. As a case study, the British Council of Churches reflects earlier, problematic attempts to alter Christian sex teaching, as well as the unfolding of later difficulties for the British churches.
Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2F1467-9809.12259
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 11:00 a.m.,
Eurozine journals,
Allgemein.
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 6:04 a.m.,
Joren Verschaeve,
Allgemein.
Kommentare geschlossen
April 14, 2015, 4:02 a.m.,
Marc von Knorring,
Allgemein.
Kommentare geschlossen