The UK and ‘genocide’ in Biafra
Journal of Genocide Research, Volume 16, Issue 2-3, Page 247-262, June–September 2014.
Quelle: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14623528.2014.936703?ai=z4&mi=3fqos0&af=R
Preface
<span class="paragraphSection">Addressing questions of German-Jewish history and culture from the eighteenth century to the present, the Year Book at hand presents articles from a variety of disciplines and through a broad range of methods. German-Jewish history—the central field of the LBI Year Book over many decades—has always been a transnational discipline. This is reflected in the three centres of the Institute in Jerusalem, London, and New York which themselves arose in the intellectual centres of German-speaking Jewish refugees. But not only have the regional, political, and religious perspectives on German-Jewish history changed over time, the disciplinary boundaries of its writing have shifted as well. This volume can be seen as an expression of these immense changes, which are similarly evident in the successful candidates of the Leo Baeck Fellowship Programme, run jointly by the LBI London and <span style="font-style:italic;">Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes</span> and funded by the <span style="font-style:italic;">Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung</span>. Over seventy fellows from the greatly diverse academic disciplines of, among others, history, literature, philosophy, film studies, theology, Judaic studies, musicology, Yiddish, and the history of science have already participated in this programme. The present volume includes a range of these approaches.</span>
Quelle: https://academic.oup.com/leobaeck/article/59/1/x/984262/Preface?rss=1
Buchbesprechungen
Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung, Volume 41, Issue 2, Page 261-374, 2014.
Quelle: http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/abs/10.3790/zhf.41.2.261?af=R
Alltag zwischen Konflikt und Toleranz. Beobachtungen zur Konfessionspolitik Brandenburg-Preußens im 18. Jahrhundert
Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung, Volume 41, Issue 2, Page 231-260, 2014.
Quelle: http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/abs/10.3790/zhf.41.2.231?af=R
Kirchgenossen an der Macht. Vormoderne politische Kultur in den „Pfarreirepubliken“ von Gersau und Dithmarschen
Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung, Volume 41, Issue 2, Page 187-230, 2014.
Quelle: http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/abs/10.3790/zhf.41.2.187?af=R
Questioning the Rule-Making Imperative in Therapeutic Stabilizations of Non-Monogamous (Open) Relationships
Given increasing social scientific and public interest in open relationships, attending to therapeutic engagements with such a lifestyle choice is of topical concern. Specifically, the rule-making imperative for the creation and stabilization of open non-monogamies involves the widely embraced principle in counseling and self-help literature that a "couple's" rules for their non-monogamous engagements are crucial for personal and relational well-being. Data presented in this article stem from semi-structured interviews with seventeen UK counselors/psychotherapists who identified their therapeutic engagements with consensual non-monogamies (primarily in gay male open relationships) as being "affirmative" in some way. A Foucauldian-inflected thematic analysis highlighted patterns of meaning in relation to: perceived non-monogamous disorder; clinical recognitions of the inevitability of disorder; and ways in which assumed non-monogamous disorder, and thus the warrant for rule-making, can be reinforced in psychological terms. Drawing on the notion of "bifurcation" put forward in chaos theory, it is argued that to enlist the imperative of rule-making as a precautionary or remedial strategy is to overlook the more productive aspects of chaotic turbulence in open relationships and thus undermine alternative recognitions of relational health and well-being.
URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs140363
Quelle: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2042
‘Rushing the growler’: can rushing and working-class politicization in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Labor History, Ahead of Print.
Quelle: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0023656X.2014.948710?ai=z4&mi=3fqos0&af=R
Theorizing national preference formation
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Ahead of Print.
Quelle: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557571.2014.936362?ai=z4&mi=3fqos0&af=R