Inhaltsverzeichnis: Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 4/2017

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201780411

Rebekka Ladewig, Schwindel. Eine Epistemologie der Orientierung, (Historische Wissensforschung 6) Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2016. VIII, 373 S., € 49,00. ISBN 978-3-16-154768-3.

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201701861

Jimena Canales, The Physicist & the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate That Changed Our Understanding of Time, Princeton: Princeton University Press 2015. 488 S., $ 24,95. ISBN 978-1-4008-6577-2.

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201701872

Silvy Chakkalakal, Die Welt in Bildern. Erfahrung und Evidenz in Friedrich J. Bertuchs „Bilderbuch für Kinder“ (1790–1830), Göttingen: Wallstein 2014. 453 S., geb., € 42,90. ISBN 978-3-8353-1559-4.

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201701863

Elizabeth Harding (Hrsg.), Kalkulierte Gelehrsamkeit. Zur Ökonomisierung der Universitäten im 18. Jahrhundert, (Wolfenbütteler Forschungen 148) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag 2016. 300 S., 11 Abb., € 62,00. ISBN 978-3-447-10714-3..

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201701877

Titelbild: (Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 4/2017)

Thumbnail image of graphical abstract

Detlef D. Spalt, Die Analysis im Wandel und im Widerstreit. Eine Formierungsgeschichte ihrer Grundbegriffe, Freiburg/München: Karl Alber 2015. xxvii, 792 S., € 39,99. ISBN 978-3-495-48740-2.

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201701862

Praktisches Wissen, Wissenschaft und Katastrophen. Zur Geschichte der sozialwissenschaftlichen Katastrophenforschung, 1949–1989

Abstract

Practical Knowledge, Science and Disasters. The History of Social Science Disaster Research, 1949–1979. During the second half of the twentieth century several US-American social science “disaster research groups” conducted field studies after earthquakes, factory explosions and “racial riots”. Their aim was to provide practical knowledge that could be applied in the planning and managing of future disasters of both peace- and wartime nature. In this paper, I will elaborate on how this research goal conflicted with some scientists’ aspirations to develop more theoretical knowledge and their own ideals of “scientificity”. I will also show how the generated research results came to be ‘impractical knowledge’, which was difficult or impossible to apply. Furthermore this paper analyzes the scientific practices that were involved at different stages of the knowledge production process and contributed to disaster research's ‘precarious’ character.

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201701819

Autoren-/Schlüsselwörterregister/Index of Keywords: Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 4/2017

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201789999

Das ‚politische Volontariat‘ des Arnold Clapmarius. Praktische Erfahrung und der Anschein praktischer Erfahrung als Qualifikation für die politischen Wissenschaften um 1600

Abstract

Arnold Clapmarius’ ‘Traineeship in politics’. Practical Experience and the Semblance of Practical Experience as a Qualification in the Field of Political Science around the Year 1600. In 1600, Arnold Clapmarius (1574–1604) was appointed the first professor for Public Law and Political Science in the Holy Roman Empire by the University of Altdorf (Nürnberg). He received this professorship though he had not yet published anything because he was a protégé of Landgrave Maurice the Learned of Hesse-Kassel. Two newly discovered letters which were written by Clapmarius to Maurice show that the young scholar did a traineeship at the Landgrave's court to gather practical experience in politics. This was probably the reason for his appointment in Altdorf. Nevertheless, he hushed up this traineeship because it did not comply to the kind of experience that were expected from a ‘politicus’ at that time, id est military service, educational journeys, foreign languages and regional studies. Thus, this paper fills a gap of Arnold Clapmarius’ biography, and provides a new perspective on the value of practical experience in the field of political science in the Early Modern Period.

Quelle: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbewi.201701809