“Lehrplan 21” – Politics and History

 

It is causing a stir among the wider public up and down the country. Currently subject to consultation, the much-debated and much-anticipated new curriculum (“Lehrplan 21”) serves to implement the mandate of the Swiss Constitution to harmonise educational objectives on all school levels.

 

A new beginning in the cantons

In Switzerland, educational sovereignty resides with the cantons, not with the federal government. Twenty-one German-speaking cantons have joined forces to provide the feasible coordination of education in Switzerland. “Lehrplan 21” integrates the national educational objectives (educational standards). It thus ensures compatibility between the cantonal educational systems and responds to the mobility of families within the country, which is becoming an increasing reality. Not only is this development pleasing and remarkable, but it is also unprecedented on this scale! “Lehrplan 21” is not a reform project, and it ties in seamlessly with existing curricula. It is meant to provide a readily usable tool for teachers, to facilitate their everyday work, and to establish a reliable and clear pedagogical framework.

“… a large sheet whose corners are being pulled in all possible directions”

One great benefit of the new curriculum is its skills orientation. “Lehrplan 21” describes the competencies to be attained by the end of compulsory education. The structure is described in three cycles, and for each cycle a minimal standard is defined. The rigorous formulation of competencies clearly indicates that the curricular requirements will not have been met simply when the syllabus in a particular subject has been “covered,” but only once the children and young people in our charge have become competent in a comprehensive sense. Being competent means having the necessary knowledge and being able to apply this knowledge in a particular situation. I realised from the beginning that “Lehrplan 21” is a large sheet whose corners are being pulled in all possible directions. It was foreseeable that lobbyists of all stripes would happily pounce on this joint achievement of the twenty-one German-speaking cantons. In what follows, I limit myself to a brief discussion of two sub-areas of “Lehrplan 21”, “Political Education and History,” and “ICT and Media.”

“History to be abolished”?

The following sections in “Lehrplan 21” discuss political education and history:

  • The chapter on sustainable development as a guiding idea, in particular the marginal note on “Politics, Democracy, and Human Rights.”
  • In the subject syllabus for “Spaces, Times, Societies” (3rd cycle), competency areas 5–8 are concerned with history. Competency area 8 contains a competency focus on political education.
  • In the subject syllabus for “Nature, Humans, Society” (1st and 2nd cycles), competency areas 9, 10, and 11 include a focus on historical competencies.

The History lobby criticised the curriculum project already in its initial stages. The criticism has prevailed until now. Three points in particular have caused discontent: first, the amalgamation of geography and history into a single subject area (“Spaces, Times, Societies”) in lower secondary schools; second, the designation of the amalgamated subject area—“Spaces, Times, Societies”—because it leads to the disappearance of “History”; and third, the fear that “Lehrplan 21” and its planning assumptions could cement in place the reduction of history lessons already introduced in certain cantons in the past. These points of criticism were also taken up by the media. One pervasive slogan in reports was that history was being abolished as a subject or that the end of history lessons had arrived! What tends to be overlooked, however, is that the draft curriculum attaches far greater importance to children learning about history at kindergarten and primary school (1st and 2nd cycles) than the current cantonal curricula. Thus, children can already learn to think historically at this age. “Lehrplan 21” as such reacts to the insights gained by history didactics in recent years. Overall, history learning has been significantly upgraded in “Nature, Humans, Society” during the first two cycles.

Media competences are crucial

The use of information technology and the development of media competences are crucial nowadays. Hence, “ICT and Media” has its own place in the curriculum and is integrated into the individual subject syllabuses. In “Lehrplan 21”, the purpose of “ICT and Media” is to ensure that pupils can participate in the media society of today and tomorrow as self-determined, creative, and mature individuals, as well as behave in an appropriate and socially responsible way. In this area, however, various issues beyond the actual curriculum still need to be resolved, such as framework conditions, jurisdiction, and (basic and further) teacher training. From the autumn of 2013, a working group will set about clarifying these questions so that a review of the “ICT and Media” syllabus can be undertaken swiftly based on the findings of the consultation process. The remit of the subject group set up meanwhile is to establish which competencies should be feasibily integrated into other subject areas and which competencies should be allocated how much teaching time at which school levels. The group is also tasked with discussing the framework necessary for implementing the curriculum as regards the basic and further training of teachers, the adjustment of teaching materials, and the provision of technical infrastructure. The resulting concept must be suited to full-scale implementation across the entire school system. Hence, it must also be implementable with limited staff and financial resources!

I look forward to your reactions to and views on “Lehrplan 21”.

 

Literature

  • Meyer, Hilbert: Kompetenzorientierung allein macht noch keinen guten Unterricht! Die “ganze Aufgabe” muss bewältigt werden. In: Lernende Schule 15 (2012) 58, S. 7-12.
  • Feindt, Andreas / Meyer, Hilbert: Kompetenzorientierter Unterricht. In: Die Grundschulzeitschrift 24 (2010) 237, S. 29-33.
  • Labbude, Peter / Adamina, Marco: Kompetenzen fördern – Standards setzen. Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in der Primarstufe, Kiel 2012.
  • Schröder, Christa / Wirth, Ingo: 99 Tipps – kompetenzorientiert unterrichten. Für die Sekundarstufe 1, Berlin 2012.

External links

Image credit
(c) Photograph by Claudio Minutella

Translation (from German)
by Kyburz&Peck, English Language Projects (www.englishprojects.ch)

Recommended Citation
Amsler, Christian: “Lehrplan 21″ – Politics and History. In: Public History Weekly 1 (2013) 9, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1515/phw-2013-539.

Copyright (c) 2013 by Oldenbourg Verlag and the author, all rights reserved. This work may be copied and redistributed for non-commercial, educational purposes, if permission is granted by the author and usage right holders. For permission please contact: julia.schreiner (at) degruyter.com.

The post “Lehrplan 21” – Politics and History appeared first on Public History Weekly.

Quelle: http://public-history-weekly.oldenbourg-verlag.de/1-2013-9/lehrplan-21-politics-and-history/

Weiterlesen

“Lehrplan 21” – Politics and History

 

It is causing a stir among the wider public up and down the country. Currently subject to consultation, the much-debated and much-anticipated new curriculum (“Lehrplan 21”) serves to implement the mandate of the Swiss Constitution to harmonise educational objectives on all school levels.

 

A new beginning in the cantons

In Switzerland, educational sovereignty resides with the cantons, not with the federal government. Twenty-one German-speaking cantons have joined forces to provide the feasible coordination of education in Switzerland. “Lehrplan 21” integrates the national educational objectives (educational standards). It thus ensures compatibility between the cantonal educational systems and responds to the mobility of families within the country, which is becoming an increasing reality. Not only is this development pleasing and remarkable, but it is also unprecedented on this scale! “Lehrplan 21” is not a reform project, and it ties in seamlessly with existing curricula. It is meant to provide a readily usable tool for teachers, to facilitate their everyday work, and to establish a reliable and clear pedagogical framework.

“… a large sheet whose corners are being pulled in all possible directions”

One great benefit of the new curriculum is its skills orientation. “Lehrplan 21” describes the competencies to be attained by the end of compulsory education. The structure is described in three cycles, and for each cycle a minimal standard is defined. The rigorous formulation of competencies clearly indicates that the curricular requirements will not have been met simply when the syllabus in a particular subject has been “covered,” but only once the children and young people in our charge have become competent in a comprehensive sense. Being competent means having the necessary knowledge and being able to apply this knowledge in a particular situation. I realised from the beginning that “Lehrplan 21” is a large sheet whose corners are being pulled in all possible directions. It was foreseeable that lobbyists of all stripes would happily pounce on this joint achievement of the twenty-one German-speaking cantons. In what follows, I limit myself to a brief discussion of two sub-areas of “Lehrplan 21”, “Political Education and History,” and “ICT and Media.”

“History to be abolished”?

The following sections in “Lehrplan 21” discuss political education and history:

  • The chapter on sustainable development as a guiding idea, in particular the marginal note on “Politics, Democracy, and Human Rights.”
  • In the subject syllabus for “Spaces, Times, Societies” (3rd cycle), competency areas 5–8 are concerned with history. Competency area 8 contains a competency focus on political education.
  • In the subject syllabus for “Nature, Humans, Society” (1st and 2nd cycles), competency areas 9, 10, and 11 include a focus on historical competencies.

The History lobby criticised the curriculum project already in its initial stages. The criticism has prevailed until now. Three points in particular have caused discontent: first, the amalgamation of geography and history into a single subject area (“Spaces, Times, Societies”) in lower secondary schools; second, the designation of the amalgamated subject area—“Spaces, Times, Societies”—because it leads to the disappearance of “History”; and third, the fear that “Lehrplan 21” and its planning assumptions could cement in place the reduction of history lessons already introduced in certain cantons in the past. These points of criticism were also taken up by the media. One pervasive slogan in reports was that history was being abolished as a subject or that the end of history lessons had arrived! What tends to be overlooked, however, is that the draft curriculum attaches far greater importance to children learning about history at kindergarten and primary school (1st and 2nd cycles) than the current cantonal curricula. Thus, children can already learn to think historically at this age. “Lehrplan 21” as such reacts to the insights gained by history didactics in recent years. Overall, history learning has been significantly upgraded in “Nature, Humans, Society” during the first two cycles.

Media competences are crucial

The use of information technology and the development of media competences are crucial nowadays. Hence, “ICT and Media” has its own place in the curriculum and is integrated into the individual subject syllabuses. In “Lehrplan 21”, the purpose of “ICT and Media” is to ensure that pupils can participate in the media society of today and tomorrow as self-determined, creative, and mature individuals, as well as behave in an appropriate and socially responsible way. In this area, however, various issues beyond the actual curriculum still need to be resolved, such as framework conditions, jurisdiction, and (basic and further) teacher training. From the autumn of 2013, a working group will set about clarifying these questions so that a review of the “ICT and Media” syllabus can be undertaken swiftly based on the findings of the consultation process. The remit of the subject group set up meanwhile is to establish which competencies should be feasibily integrated into other subject areas and which competencies should be allocated how much teaching time at which school levels. The group is also tasked with discussing the framework necessary for implementing the curriculum as regards the basic and further training of teachers, the adjustment of teaching materials, and the provision of technical infrastructure. The resulting concept must be suited to full-scale implementation across the entire school system. Hence, it must also be implementable with limited staff and financial resources!

I look forward to your reactions to and views on “Lehrplan 21”.

 

Literature

  • Meyer, Hilbert: Kompetenzorientierung allein macht noch keinen guten Unterricht! Die “ganze Aufgabe” muss bewältigt werden. In: Lernende Schule 15 (2012) 58, S. 7-12.
  • Feindt, Andreas / Meyer, Hilbert: Kompetenzorientierter Unterricht. In: Die Grundschulzeitschrift 24 (2010) 237, S. 29-33.
  • Labbude, Peter / Adamina, Marco: Kompetenzen fördern – Standards setzen. Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in der Primarstufe, Kiel 2012.
  • Schröder, Christa / Wirth, Ingo: 99 Tipps – kompetenzorientiert unterrichten. Für die Sekundarstufe 1, Berlin 2012.

External links

Image credit
(c) Photograph by Claudio Minutella

Translation (from German)
by Kyburz&Peck, English Language Projects (www.englishprojects.ch)

Recommended Citation
Amsler, Christian: “Lehrplan 21″ – Politics and History. In: Public History Weekly 1 (2013) 9, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1515/phw-2013-539.

Copyright (c) 2013 by Oldenbourg Verlag and the author, all rights reserved. This work may be copied and redistributed for non-commercial, educational purposes, if permission is granted by the author and usage right holders. For permission please contact: julia.schreiner (at) degruyter.com.

The post “Lehrplan 21” – Politics and History appeared first on Public History Weekly.

Quelle: http://public-history-weekly.oldenbourg-verlag.de/1-2013-9/lehrplan-21-politics-and-history/

Weiterlesen

Seltsame Wege. Straßennamen heute

 

Historische Orientierung gesucht! In öffentlichen und virtuellen Räumen werden derzeit hitzige Debatten über Straßenumbenennungen geführt. Gestritten wird um Fragen der Ehre und Tradition. Kommunale Geschichtspolitik trifft auf heterogene Geschichtsbedürfnisse.

 

Die Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen

Vom Graseweg zur Bäckergasse – frühe Straßennamen sind dem alltäglichen Sprachgebrauch entlehnt und folgten den räumlichen Orientierungsbedürfnissen der StadtbewohnerInnen. Dies änderte sich im 19. Jahrhundert. Das expandierende Straßennetz wurde als symbolisches Instrument städtischer Geschichtspolitik entdeckt und in den Dienst politisch-ideologischer Identitätsstiftung gestellt. Entlang politischer Zäsuren wurden seither zentrale historische Orientierungsachsen wiederholt umbenannt – vom Schlossplatz zum Platz der Republik und zurück. Ebenso können Traditionsstränge im semantischen Netz der Stadt fortschrieben oder aber als Artefakte marginalisiert werden. Dem Flaneur erschließt sich die Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen nur bedingt. Dagegen eröffnen jüngste Untersuchungen zu Straßennamenkorpora oder zu Diskursen um Straßenumbenennungen den Blick auf das historisch gewachsene Benennungs- und Identitätsprofil deutscher Städte und die damit verbundenen Geschichtsbilder und Wertorientierungen.

Wirklich neue Wege?

Während die Vergabe und Umbenennung von Straßennamen bislang ein Arkanum der Kommunalpolitik zu sein schien, erregt die Frage der Zukunftsfähigkeit städtischer Wegweiser zunehmend öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit. Ausgelöst von lokalen Debatten um „NS-belastete“-Straßennamen beginnt man nicht nur in Wien1 oder Münster2 mit der systematischen Erfassung, Analyse und Veröffentlichung der Straßennamenkorpora. Einerseits wird auf diesem Wege eine breit zugängliche Diskussionsgrundlage geschaffen: Biografien einst geehrter Namensgeber werden neu bewertet, die symbolische Bedeutung von Erinnerungsorten wird vergegenwärtigt und der Kontext der Benennung erhellt. Andererseits gewinnen weiße Flecken städtischer Erinnerungskultur, aber auch Muster der Marginalisierung gruppengebundener Traditionen an Kontur. Ob man dies als Demokratisierung städtischer Geschichtspolitik interpretieren kann, die auf Transparenz, Diskurs und Reflexivität setzt, bleibt abzuwarten.

Divergente Interessen

Überregionale Trends in der Benennungspraxis sind jedoch unübersehbar: Monumentalisches Erinnern weicht mit der Debatte um NS-belastete Straßennamen kritischer Identitätsreflexion. Mit ehrend-mahnender Erinnerung an die Opfer zweier deutscher Diktaturen aber auch deutscher Kolonialpolitik gewinnen Straßennamen als symbolische Form der Wiedergutmachung an Bedeutung.3 Aktuell erregt so in Hamburg die auf das Engagement von Bürgerinitiativen zurückgehende Wanderausstellung „freedom roads! Koloniale Straßennamen und postkoloniale Erinnerungskultur“ öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit.4 Wie in Münster entdeckt städtische Geschichtspolitik die Straßennamen aber auch als ökonomisches Kapital. Der Hindenburgplatz wird zum Schlossplatz. Mit der Aura des Authentischen lockt man TouristInnen, betreibt city branding. Und jeder Monopoly-Spieler ahnt: Immobilienbesitzern verheißt die Adresse Wertsteigerung.

Entsorgung vs. Erinnerungsstolz

Im Feld der Kommunalpolitik ist die ehrende Funktion von Straßennamen unstrittig.  Umbenennungen werden gern als Ausweis eines städtischen „Geschichtsbewusstseins“ inszeniert. UmbenennungsgegnerInnen prangern dagegen die Form der „Entsorgung der Vergangenheit“ an, die in „Geschichtslosigkeit“ münde.5 Mit analytischer Distanz kann man wie Götz Aly den Quellenwert des städtischen Schilderwaldes preisen – ein Friedhof der Ahnen, der die Selektivität und Vergänglichkeit historischer Deutungen demonstriert und damit den Zeitgeist jeder Schilderstürmerei offenbart.6 Andere sehen eine Geschichte „mit Ecken und Kanten“ als didaktische Chance. Einst ehrende Zeichen würden so zu Mahnmalen gegen das Vergessen. Erläuterungstafeln unter Straßenschildern demonstrieren nicht zuletzt den „Erinnerungsstolz“ der Gegenwart, beseelt vom Wunsch, dem gesellschaftlichen Lern- und Wandlungsprozesses Dauer zu verleihen.

Postmodernes Spiel

Die Debatte um die historische Orientierungsfunktion städtischer Straßennamen ist im Gange – viele Fragen sind offen: Ob und wie die „zerbrochenen Spiegel“ deutscher Geschichte symbolisch repräsentieren? Hauptstraße oder Sackgasse – welche Räume öffnen für heterogene politische, religiöse, soziale und ethnische Identitätsbedürfnisse, für Mehrheiten und Minderheiten, unterschiedliche Generationen? Obsiegt die Ökonomisierung der Geschichtskultur? Sind Straßennamen zukünftig gewinnbringendes Kapital in den Händen des Stadtmarketing? Lehnen wir uns zurück, beobachten wir mit analytischer Distanz, wie das postmoderne Spiel mit Sinn und Bedeutungen nicht nur im virtuellen Raum,7 sondern auch auf unseren Straßen zu historischer Orientierungslosigkeit führt? Nein! Die Beschreibfläche ist limitiert. Mit Karl Schlögl bleibt „Namensgeschichte immer auch Herrschaftsgeschichte“8 und geschichtspolitischer „Straßenkampf“ damit ein unverzichtbares Mittel kollektiver Identitätsvergewisserung.

 

Literatur

  • Sänger, Johanna: Heldenkult und Heimatliebe. Straßen- und Ehrennamen im offiziellen Gedächtnis der DDR, Berlin 2006.
  • Pöppinghege, Rainer: Wege des Erinnerns. Was Straßennamen über das deutsche Geschichtsbewusstsein aussagen, Münster 2007.
  • Werner, Marion: Vom Adolf-Hitler-Platz zum Ebertplatz. Eine Kulturgeschichte der Kölner Straßennamen seit 1933, Köln/Weimar/Wien 2008.

Externe Links

 

Abbildungsnachweis
© Saskia Handro. Im Jahr 2010 umbenannte Straße in Münster.

Empfohlene Zitierweise
Handro, Saskia: Seltsame Wege. Straßennamen heute. In: Public History Weekly 1 (2013) 4, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1515/phw-2013-255.

Copyright (c) 2013 by Oldenbourg Verlag and the author, all rights reserved. This work may be copied and redistributed for non-commercial, educational purposes, if permission is granted by the author and usage right holders. For permission please contact: julia.schreiner (at) degruyter.com.

The post Seltsame Wege. Straßennamen heute appeared first on Public History Weekly.

Quelle: http://public-history-weekly.oldenbourg-verlag.de/1-2013-4/seltsame-wege-strassennamen-heute/

Weiterlesen