Why is it so expensive to access the results of publicly-funded research – a fact that makes r...
Quelle: https://gclf.hypotheses.org/443
Geschichtswissenschaftliche Blogs auf einen Blick
Why is it so expensive to access the results of publicly-funded research – a fact that makes r...
Quelle: https://gclf.hypotheses.org/443
Some years have passed since the appearance of the Historical and Cultural Standard (ИКС) for teaching Russian history. It has significantly changed the...
The post “Chronological Frameworks”, New History Strategy? (ИКС) appeared first on Public History Weekly.
Quelle: https://public-history-weekly.degruyter.com/6-2018-33/%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%81-russian-history/
Spätestens mit der Gründung der German Labour History Association (GLHA) Anfang 2017 hat s...
An unserer Diskussion zur Public History zwischen Fachdiskurs, Politik und populärer Vermittl...
Quelle: https://gid.hypotheses.org/1929
Sich einen Überblick über digitale Projekt zu verschaffen ist oftmals nicht leicht. Mit einer eigenen Datenbank zu digitalen Projekten und digitalen Ressourcen möchte die Society for French Historical Studies als Betreiberin von H-France dies jetzt für die französische und francophone Forschung erleichtern und ruft dazu auf, die eigenen Projekte in der neuen Datenbank zu melden: https://www.h-france.net/dh/registry/search.php
Die Datenbank ist nach Zeitraum, Fachgebiet, Materialtyp, Sprache und geografischem Schwerpunkt durchsuchbar. Zusätzlich existiert eine Stichwortsuche in den Beschreibungen des Projekts.
Derzeit sind noch wenige Projekte eingetragen, daher also auch hier der Aufruf, eigene Projekte zu melden.
von Luisa Fischer (Projektleiterin) Das Citizen Science-Projekt „Alltagswissen zu Populismus&l...
Quelle: https://bkw.hypotheses.org/1166
Digitale Spiele: ein Fenster zur Geschichtskultur – hier eine Szene aus dem Steinzeit-Abenteue...
Warum spricht man eigentlich vom Kriegsausbruch, aber nicht vom Friedensende? Und wieso heißt ...
Though the Ottoman empire controlled a significant portion of the Balkan region in the early modern era, the historiographical traditions established by historical texts created in the region during that period has received comparatively little attention as a research topic.[1] To fill this gap in research and to make the resulting data publicly available, the Historiography in Ottoman Europe project was developed with the support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) to create a database that would include metadata for several hundred primary sources from the years 1500 to 1800 and over 3,600 secondary works on the history of Ottoman Europe. The project’s funding is coming to an end this year, but the site will remain active and invites feedback, partnerships and additional submissions of relevant data.[2]
The project is a collaboration between the office of the Chair for the History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey (Lehrstuhl für Geschichte des Osmanischen Reiches und der Türkei, ORT) of Ruhr University Bochum and Bochum University Library. Both institutions brought their specific expertise to the project and worked in synergy to create fresh research data and conceptualize a customized, optimized way of presenting these findings for added utility. The team members from the ORT office conducted research in libraries and archives worldwide to locate, examine and describe neglected sources and to compile relevant secondary material on these documents. Team members from the library oversaw the project’s web presence and entered data collected by the research team members into the jointly conceptualized system. They validated the information and complemented it with links, filters and further metadata to create the specific data sets that characterize the HOE corpus.
Quelle: https://href.hypotheses.org/1022